The Great Schism: What Divided The Christian Church?

The Great Schism, also known as the East-West Schism, was a significant event in the history of Christianity that occurred in 1054 AD. The Schism refers to the separation of the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Western Roman Catholic Church, which had a lasting impact on the Christian faith. Political, theological, and cultural differences contributed to this separation, causing the two churches to develop different traditions, practices, and beliefs.

Despite the common belief that the Schism occurred overnight, it was actually a gradual process that had been brewing for centuries. In this blog post, we will examine the roots of disunity, the East-West divide, the papal controversy, the theological differences, and the political factor that led to the split of the Christian Church.

If you are curious to know more about the factors that led to the Great Schism and the impact it had on the Christian Church, keep reading this post as we delve into this fascinating topic.

The Roots of Disunity

The Great Schism of 1054, which marked the split between the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches, was a culmination of centuries of growing division. One major factor was the use of different languages – Latin in the West and Greek in the East – which led to differences in theology and liturgy. Language barriers created misunderstandings and disagreements between the two sides.

Another factor was the political divide between the Eastern and Western Empires. The Eastern Empire, also known as the Byzantine Empire, had a different political structure and worldview compared to the Western Empire. Political differences further exacerbated the division between the two sides.

Finally, there were theological differences that emerged over time. For example, in the West, the Pope was considered to be the supreme authority, while in the East, the Patriarch was seen as the highest authority. Additionally, the Western Church emphasized the role of faith in salvation, while the Eastern Church emphasized the role of good works. These differences led to doctrinal disputes that contributed to the eventual split.

The Language Barrier

One significant factor contributing to the disunity in the early Christian Church was the language barrier. In the early days of Christianity, many followers spoke different dialects of Greek, Latin, and Aramaic, making it challenging to communicate and share ideas.

This language barrier was particularly problematic when it came to interpreting scripture. Different interpretations and translations of the Bible led to varying beliefs and practices among different groups of Christians, further dividing the Church.

One of the most notable examples of the language barrier causing disunity in the Church was the Filioque Controversy. This debate over the wording of the Nicene Creed, particularly the phrase “and the Son,” in Latin caused a significant rift between the Western and Eastern Churches, ultimately leading to the Great Schism.

The Cultural Divide

Another major factor contributing to the roots of disunity was the cultural differences between the Eastern and Western Churches. The East was heavily influenced by Greek culture, while the West was influenced by Roman culture. This resulted in different approaches to religious practices, such as the use of icons, which the East favored, and the rejection of icons, which the West favored.

The cultural divide was further exacerbated by political factors. The East saw itself as the continuation of the Byzantine Empire, while the West saw itself as the continuation of the Roman Empire. This led to a sense of superiority on both sides, making compromise difficult.

Additionally, linguistic differences also played a role in the cultural divide. The Eastern Church used Greek as its primary language, while the Western Church used Latin. This made communication difficult and led to misunderstandings and different interpretations of theological concepts.

The Doctrinal Disputes

The theological differences between the Eastern and Western churches ultimately led to the Great Schism. One of the key doctrinal disputes was over the use of the Filioque clause in the Nicene Creed. The Eastern church rejected the inclusion of this clause, which affirmed that the Holy Spirit proceeded from both the Father and the Son, whereas the Western church accepted it.

Another dispute was over the use of Icons, religious images that were widely used in the Eastern church but opposed by some in the Western church. The use of Icons became a heated topic, with the Eastern church defending it as an important part of their religious tradition, while the Western church saw it as a form of idolatry.

The issue of Papal Supremacy was also a doctrinal dispute that contributed to the Great Schism. The Eastern church did not recognize the Pope as having authority over the entire Christian church, but instead saw him as the bishop of Rome. Meanwhile, the Western church believed that the Pope had universal jurisdiction over the entire church.

The East-West Divide

The Great Schism that divided the Christian church into the Western and Eastern branches was a culmination of several factors, including cultural, theological, and political differences. These differences had been brewing for centuries, and they finally came to a head in the 11th century.

One of the most significant issues that led to the split was the filioque controversy. The West had added the phrase “and the Son” to the Nicene Creed, which the East saw as a violation of the doctrine of the Trinity. The East also disagreed with the West’s use of unleavened bread in the Eucharist and their belief in the supremacy of the pope.

Another significant factor was the language barrier. Greek was the dominant language in the East, while Latin was the official language in the West. This led to communication problems and misunderstandings, making it difficult to resolve disputes.

The political situation of the time also played a significant role in the schism. The Byzantine Empire in the East was in decline and facing threats from various invaders, while the Papacy in the West was gaining more power and influence. This created tension between the two sides, with each accusing the other of meddling in their affairs.

Efforts were made to reunite the two churches, but they ultimately failed. In 1054, the Patriarch of Constantinople and the Pope excommunicated each other, formalizing the split. The Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church remain separate to this day.

The Photian Schism

The East-West divide was further exacerbated by the Photian Schism, which took place in the 9th century. Photius, the Patriarch of Constantinople, had been deposed by the Pope in favor of another candidate. This move was seen as a direct challenge to the authority of the Eastern Church.

Political Tensions: The Photian Schism was not only a religious conflict but also a political one, as it was fueled by the rivalry between the Byzantine Empire and the Holy Roman Empire.

Theological Differences: The dispute between Photius and the Pope centered on the addition of the “Filioque” clause to the Nicene Creed, which had been introduced in the West but not in the East.

Effects: The schism resulted in the mutual excommunication of the Pope and the Patriarch, and the establishment of separate Churches in the East and West. The Photian Schism also laid the groundwork for the Great Schism, which would take place several centuries later.

The Council of Chalcedon

1. The Council of Chalcedon was a church council held in 451 AD in Chalcedon, a city in modern-day Turkey.

2. The council was called by the Roman Emperor Marcian to address the controversy surrounding the nature of Jesus Christ.

3. Some believed that Jesus was only divine, while others believed he was only human. The council’s decision was to affirm that Jesus was both fully divine and fully human.

4. This decision, known as the Chalcedonian Definition, became a defining statement of orthodox Christian belief and is still held by most Christians today.

5. The council also recognized the Pope of Rome as the first among equals in the church hierarchy, a decision that would eventually lead to the development of the Roman Catholic Church.

The council was attended by over 500 bishops and was one of the most important councils in the history of Christianity. It helped to establish a standard of orthodox belief that has endured for centuries.

Year	Location	Significance
325 AD	Nicaea	The first council to establish a standard of orthodox belief.
381 AD	Constantinople	Established the doctrine of the Trinity.
431 AD	Ephesus	Declared that Jesus was one person with two natures: divine and human.
451 AD	Chalcedon	Further defined the nature of Jesus and recognized the Pope of Rome as the first among equals in the church hierarchy.
787 AD	Nicaea	Declared that icons and religious images could be used in worship.

The Council of Chalcedon was a crucial moment in the development of Christian theology and doctrine. Its decision to affirm the dual nature of Jesus Christ helped to establish a standard of orthodox belief that has endured for centuries. Today, the Chalcedonian Definition is still held by most Christians, including Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestants.

The Iconoclastic Controversy

The Iconoclastic Controversy was a religious conflict in the Byzantine Empire during the 8th and 9th centuries. The controversy was centered around the use of religious images, or icons, in worship. Those who opposed the use of icons were known as iconoclasts, while those who supported their use were known as iconodules. The controversy had far-reaching implications for the Byzantine Empire and the wider Christian world, and it is still studied and debated by scholars today.

The controversy began in 726 when Emperor Leo III issued an edict forbidding the use of icons in religious worship. The edict was met with resistance, particularly in the eastern provinces of the empire, where the use of icons was deeply ingrained in religious practice. The controversy continued to escalate, and in 787, the Seventh Ecumenical Council, also known as the Second Council of Nicaea, affirmed the use of icons in religious worship.

However, the controversy did not end with the council’s decision. The controversy continued to simmer throughout the Byzantine Empire, with iconoclasts and iconodules clashing over the use of icons. The controversy reached its peak under Emperor Constantine V, who was a strong supporter of the iconoclasts. During his reign, thousands of icons were destroyed, and their use was outlawed.

• Opposition: The iconoclasts saw the use of icons as a form of idolatry, which they believed was forbidden by the Bible.
• Support: The iconodules saw the use of icons as a way of connecting with the divine, and a reminder of the incarnation of Christ.
• Impact: The controversy had a significant impact on the Byzantine Empire, leading to political, social, and religious upheaval.
• Legacy: The Iconoclastic Controversy has had a lasting legacy in the Christian world, influencing art, theology, and religious practice.
• Resolution: The controversy was finally resolved in 843 when Empress Theodora restored the use of icons in the Byzantine Empire.

Despite the controversy’s resolution, its impact continued to be felt in the Byzantine Empire and beyond. The controversy had led to the development of new theological ideas and had influenced the development of religious art. Today, the controversy remains a subject of study and debate, with scholars continuing to explore its implications for the Byzantine Empire and the wider Christian world.

The Papal Controversy

During the Middle Ages, the authority of the Pope was often contested by secular rulers and even some religious figures. This led to a series of conflicts known as the Papal Controversy.

One of the main issues was the question of who had the power to appoint bishops and other high-ranking church officials. The Pope believed that this was his exclusive right, while some monarchs and local lords claimed that they had the same authority.

The controversy reached its height in the 11th century with the Investiture Conflict, a long and bitter struggle between the Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor over the issue of investiture, or the right to appoint church officials. The conflict was finally resolved in the Concordat of Worms in 1122, which recognized the Pope’s authority in spiritual matters and the Emperor’s authority in secular matters.

The Filioque Clause

The Filioque Clause was a theological controversy that played a significant role in the split between the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church. The controversy centered around the question of whether the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone, as the Eastern Church maintained, or from both the Father and the Son, as the Western Church believed.

The debate over the Filioque Clause began in the 6th century and continued for several centuries, with each side putting forward their arguments and trying to convince the other of their position. In the end, the disagreement over the Filioque Clause was one of the factors that led to the Great Schism of 1054, which split the Christian Church into the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church.

The controversy was not just a matter of theological doctrine, but also had political and cultural implications. The Eastern Orthodox Church saw the adoption of the Filioque Clause as an example of Western arrogance and domination, and it became a symbol of the cultural differences between the East and West.

The Investiture Controversy

The Investiture Controversy was a power struggle between the papacy and the Holy Roman Emperor over the appointment of bishops and other church officials. It began in the 11th century and lasted for several decades, causing a rift between the church and the state.

The controversy stemmed from the belief that spiritual authority was superior to secular authority. The pope believed that he had the right to appoint church officials, while the emperor believed that he had the authority to appoint anyone in his empire, including church officials.

The conflict came to a head in 1075 when Pope Gregory VII issued a decree forbidding secular leaders from appointing bishops or investing them with the symbols of their office. This sparked a long and bitter struggle between the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire, which was only resolved with the Concordat of Worms in 1122.

• Papacy: The Investiture Controversy was a pivotal moment in the history of the papacy. It demonstrated the pope’s determination to assert his authority over the church and the state.
• Holy Roman Emperor: The Holy Roman Emperor saw the controversy as a challenge to his authority over the church and his empire. The conflict strained the relationship between the empire and the papacy for decades.
• Concordat of Worms: The Concordat of Worms was a treaty signed in 1122 between the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire that ended the Investiture Controversy. It established the principle of dual investiture, in which the pope appointed church officials and the emperor invested them with the symbols of their office.
• Simony: The Investiture Controversy also raised the issue of simony, the practice of buying and selling church offices. The pope sought to eliminate this practice by asserting his right to appoint church officials.
• Secular vs. Spiritual: The Investiture Controversy highlighted the tension between secular and spiritual authority in medieval Europe. It demonstrated the growing power of the papacy and the church, which would continue to play a major role in European politics for centuries to come.

The Investiture Controversy had far-reaching consequences for the church and the state. It marked a turning point in the relationship between the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire, and it helped to establish the principle of church autonomy. It also paved the way for the development of the modern nation-state, as secular rulers began to assert their authority over the church.

The Avignon Papacy

The Avignon Papacy, also known as the Babylonian Captivity, was a period from 1309 to 1377 during which seven successive popes resided in Avignon, France instead of Rome. The move was prompted by political unrest in Italy and conflicts between the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire.

The period is known for its corruption, as the popes were heavily influenced by the French monarchy and often appointed French cardinals to high positions within the church. Additionally, the popes engaged in lavish spending and maintained extravagant lifestyles, leading to criticism from reformers like John Wycliffe.

The Avignon Papacy came to an end with the election of Pope Gregory XI, who returned the papacy to Rome in 137However, the move was not without its consequences, as it contributed to the Western Schism, during which rival popes claimed the papacy and divided the Catholic Church.

Theological Differences

Original Sin: One of the main differences between Catholic and Orthodox theology is the doctrine of original sin. Catholics believe that original sin was passed down from Adam and Eve, resulting in a fallen state for all humanity. The Orthodox, on the other hand, believe that all people are born into a fallen world but do not inherit the guilt of Adam and Eve’s sin.

The Filioque Clause: Another major point of contention between Catholic and Orthodox theology is the inclusion of the Filioque clause in the Nicene Creed. The Catholic Church believes that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son, while the Orthodox Church believes that the Holy Spirit proceeds only from the Father.

The Papacy: The role and authority of the pope is another theological difference between the two churches. Catholics view the pope as the supreme leader of the Church and believe in papal infallibility, while the Orthodox Church maintains a more decentralized leadership structure and rejects the idea of papal supremacy.

The Eucharist: The understanding of the Eucharist is another theological difference between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches. Catholics believe in transubstantiation, the idea that the bread and wine actually become the body and blood of Christ, while the Orthodox Church maintains a more mystical view of the Eucharist, believing that the bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ in a spiritual sense.

The Nature of the Holy Spirit

The nature of the Holy Spirit has been a topic of debate and disagreement in Christian theology. One of the main controversies surrounding the Holy Spirit is whether it proceeds from the Father only, or from both the Father and the Son, as stated in the Filioque clause.

Eastern Orthodox Christians believe that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father alone, while Western Christians, including Roman Catholics and Protestants, believe that the Holy Spirit proceeds from both the Father and the Son. This theological difference was one of the factors that led to the Great Schism between Eastern and Western Christianity in 1054.

Another aspect of the nature of the Holy Spirit that has caused controversy is the role of the Holy Spirit in the Trinity. Some theologians see the Holy Spirit as subordinate to the Father and the Son, while others believe that the Holy Spirit is equal in status to the other members of the Trinity.

Despite these differences, the Holy Spirit remains an important aspect of Christian theology and is often described as the third person of the Trinity, alongside the Father and the Son.

The Political Factor

Power Struggle: Politics played a significant role in the controversies surrounding the Church. Popes and emperors struggled for power and influence, often at the expense of the Church’s unity and mission.

Nationalism: Nationalism also played a part in the political factors affecting the Church. As various nations rose to power, they sought to assert their own identity, sometimes in opposition to the universal authority of the Church.

The Role of the State: The relationship between the Church and the State was another political factor in the controversies. Some believed that the State should have more power in religious matters, while others believed that the Church should be independent of secular authority.

Wars and Conflicts: Wars and conflicts between nations often spilled over into the Church, leading to divisions and controversies. For example, the Hundred Years’ War between England and France had a significant impact on the Church, particularly during the Avignon Papacy.

The Rise of the Holy Roman Empire

The Holy Roman Empire emerged as a political entity in the early Middle Ages, tracing its roots back to the reign of Charlemagne in the 9th century. Its power and influence grew over the centuries, with the empire becoming a dominant force in Europe during the High Middle Ages.

The emperors of the Holy Roman Empire claimed to be the successors of the ancient Roman emperors and held significant political and religious authority. They often clashed with the popes over issues such as investiture and the authority of the church.

The Holy Roman Empire also played a major role in shaping the politics and culture of Europe during the medieval period. It was a central player in the Crusades and helped to spread Christianity throughout the continent. The empire’s capital, Vienna, became a center of art, music, and intellectual activity.

• Charlemagne: The first ruler to unite much of Western Europe since the Roman Empire, Charlemagne is considered one of the most important figures of the Middle Ages.
• Investiture: A major conflict between the Holy Roman Empire and the papacy, the Investiture Controversy was a struggle over who had the power to appoint bishops and other church officials.
• Habsburg Dynasty: The Habsburgs were one of the most powerful families in Europe and ruled over the Holy Roman Empire for centuries.
• Thirty Years’ War: This devastating conflict began as a religious war between Protestants and Catholics in the Holy Roman Empire and eventually grew into a wider European conflict.
• Dissolution: The Holy Roman Empire was dissolved in 1806 after centuries of decline and fragmentation. Its legacy, however, continued to influence European politics and culture for centuries to come.

Overall, the Holy Roman Empire played a crucial role in shaping the political, religious, and cultural landscape of medieval Europe. Its legacy continues to be felt today, as the empire’s complex history continues to be studied and debated by scholars and historians around the world.

The Aftermath and Legacy

The aftermath of the Great Schism saw the two branches of Christianity, Eastern Orthodoxy and Roman Catholicism, develop independently of each other. The schism led to the strengthening of the power of the patriarchs in the east and the popes in the west, as they became the respective heads of their churches.

The legacy of the Great Schism can be seen in the continuing differences between the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches. Despite attempts at reconciliation, the theological and cultural differences that led to the schism have proved difficult to overcome.

The Great Schism also had political consequences. The division of the Roman Empire into east and west had already weakened the empire, and the schism further undermined its authority. This contributed to the rise of independent nation-states in Europe and the eventual decline of the Holy Roman Empire.

The schism also had an impact on religious art and architecture. The Orthodox Church developed its own distinctive style of art, characterized by icons and mosaics, while the Catholic Church embraced the use of statues and stained glass windows.

Despite the division, there have been attempts at reconciliation between the two churches. The Joint International Commission for Theological Dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church was established in 1979 and has been working towards overcoming the theological differences that led to the schism.

The Council of Florence

The Council of Florence, also known as the Council of Union, was a gathering of Catholic and Orthodox leaders aimed at resolving the schism that had divided the churches for centuries. Held in Florence, Italy, between 1438 and 1445, the council addressed many theological and political issues.

One of the most important agreements reached at the Council of Florence was the union of the Eastern and Western churches, which was approved by both sides. This agreement included acceptance of the doctrine of the Filioque, the use of unleavened bread in the Eucharist, and the recognition of the Pope as the head of the Church.

Despite these agreements, the union was short-lived, and tensions between the Catholic and Orthodox churches continued. Some Orthodox leaders who had initially agreed to the union faced opposition from their followers when they returned home, while others never fully accepted the terms of the agreement.

The Reformation

The Protestant Reformation was a 16th-century religious movement that aimed to reform the practices and beliefs of the Catholic Church. The movement began in Germany in 1517 when Martin Luther, a German monk, publicly criticized the sale of indulgences by the Church. The Reformation soon spread to other parts of Europe, leading to the establishment of several Protestant denominations, such as Lutheranism, Calvinism, and Anglicanism.

The Reformation was fueled by several factors, including the corruption and abuses within the Catholic Church, the rise of humanism and individualism, and the increasing availability of printed materials, which allowed for the spread of ideas and information. The movement had far-reaching consequences, including the fragmentation of the Christian church and the emergence of new religious and political institutions.

One of the key theological differences between the Catholic Church and the Protestant reformers was the doctrine of justification by faith alone. The reformers believed that salvation was obtained by faith in Jesus Christ alone, rather than through good works or the sacraments. They also rejected the authority of the Pope and the Catholic Church’s teachings on the role of the priesthood and the nature of the Eucharist.

The Ecumenical Movement

The Ecumenical Movement is a global effort to promote unity among Christian churches and denominations. It began in the early 20th century as a response to the increasing division among Christians.

The movement emphasizes the commonalities between different branches of Christianity, rather than the differences. It seeks to promote dialogue and understanding between different churches, with the goal of eventual unity.

The movement has led to significant progress in terms of improved relationships and cooperation between different Christian groups. However, there are still many theological, cultural, and practical obstacles that must be overcome in order to achieve full unity.

Frequently Asked Questions